I recently asked about the damp that's appearing in our house on this thread.
I've looked at a solution, but want to check it off here, to ensure I don't cause myself more trouble:
The plan is to dig up the concrete, install a perforated pipe on the two sides of the property affected, and dig down as low as possible without compromising the required fall (there is no foundation, but hopefully, that far...). Backfill with clean stone and point the pipes at our storm/rainwater collection tank, which then gets pumped away.
This idea might be considered terrible - in which case, please let me know - but I wanted to check two aspects suggested by the installer. One option is to apply a damp-proof membrane to the building's face and backfill with 40mm stone. Instead of leaving the top open, as I've seen most often with this, though, he proposes that they would want to reconcrete the surface.
These make sense to me in principle; he reasons that the DPM on the building face minimises any water sitting around the pipe from seeping into the walls. Concreting back over is his preference to avoid surface water complications. Given appears to be a subterranean issue that presents itself entirely during periods of very dry weather; it does not seem to be a surface rainwater issue. In his experience, leaving this open would likely clog horribly and quickly (oak trees drop all over this alley at the back of the house), and it is asking for more complications.
A very reputable firm, have done work for us in the past around drainage and have been superb in those instances, but I'm coming here to check others' thoughts - appreciate this making sense in principle doesn't mean it makes sense.
I've looked at a solution, but want to check it off here, to ensure I don't cause myself more trouble:
The plan is to dig up the concrete, install a perforated pipe on the two sides of the property affected, and dig down as low as possible without compromising the required fall (there is no foundation, but hopefully, that far...). Backfill with clean stone and point the pipes at our storm/rainwater collection tank, which then gets pumped away.
This idea might be considered terrible - in which case, please let me know - but I wanted to check two aspects suggested by the installer. One option is to apply a damp-proof membrane to the building's face and backfill with 40mm stone. Instead of leaving the top open, as I've seen most often with this, though, he proposes that they would want to reconcrete the surface.
These make sense to me in principle; he reasons that the DPM on the building face minimises any water sitting around the pipe from seeping into the walls. Concreting back over is his preference to avoid surface water complications. Given appears to be a subterranean issue that presents itself entirely during periods of very dry weather; it does not seem to be a surface rainwater issue. In his experience, leaving this open would likely clog horribly and quickly (oak trees drop all over this alley at the back of the house), and it is asking for more complications.
A very reputable firm, have done work for us in the past around drainage and have been superb in those instances, but I'm coming here to check others' thoughts - appreciate this making sense in principle doesn't mean it makes sense.