overlander matt
Member
- Messages
- 383
Thanks Stuart. I should be starting on the arch today.
Thanks! The arch is a little twisted but hopefully it will do the job. We have another arch needing some attention at some stage... Good luck with your arch project!I’m trying to find an excuse to build a brick or stone arch here as it’s something I’ve always wanted to do - that looks brilliant - great job![]()
Thanks Flyfisher. There are lots of walnuts here too this year. I think the tree has to stay for now - it is not ours to make any decision on. There is one large branch extending over the new wall that makes me nervous given the hollow nature of the trunk in that area. I would like to remove that but the landowner was not so keen.We have a couple of walnut trees (which, incidentally, are absolutely loaded with walnuts this year after very little in recent years - perhaps due to the extreme weather earlier this year?), but neither of them are leaning like the one in the photo.
Assuming you want to keep the tree, the only thing I can think of is to just build the wall around it. Now you're au fait with building an arch, how about a sort of inverted arch underneath and around the tree? Not touching, but maybe leaving a 100mm gaps all around the errant trunk? Of course, if the tree moves significantly in future years it'll likely destroy the wall but if/when that time comes and it finally has to be dispatched to the great woodburner in the sky, at least there shouldn't be too much of the wall that needs rebuilding.
Thanks Stevers. We are considering a sunken greenhouse with a floor level around 300mm below the ground level. It's still very much at the planning stage but I think that will work out to give sufficient headroom. It's likely to be another project that will run over time and over budget.You've made a lovely job of that wall!
View attachment 17218
You might want to consider 'span and a half', unless you want to go on up with the brickwork. Gives a hard to clean bit of roof, though it's out of sight and doesn't need shading. There was me thinking that da*n hedge was a bit tall now it's a foot lower!
I'm pretty sure that anyone can legally remove any foliage that 'trespasses' into their own land and the space above it, including tree branches. I've also heard that the cuttings should be offered back to the neighbouring owner, but I'm less certain about the legality of that.I think the tree has to stay for now - it is not ours to make any decision on. There is one large branch extending over the new wall that makes me nervous given the hollow nature of the trunk in that area. I would like to remove that but the landowner was not so keen.
This is correct but as you point out, being legally correct doesn’t mean you won’t upset peopleI'm pretty sure that anyone can legally remove any foliage that 'trespasses' into their own land and the space above it, including tree branches.
This is not a thing - if you do cut down trespassing branches etc it then becomes your legal responsibility to dispose of them appropriately, to the extent that if you throw them back into your neighbour’s land you could be done for fly tipping. Been there and had that argumentI've also heard that the cuttings should be offered back to the neighbouring owner, but I'm less certain about the legality of that.
Also, how exactly are you keeping your local squirrels at bay or did you and @Flyfisher ship em off to me?